This is probably the most important post I will ever make. If you have been contemplating getting the Covid-19 vaccine, take the time and educate yourself first and be aware of what it is, the risks, your informed consent, and other treatments available (yes, there are plenty of treatments effective against Covid-19, many have been suppressed).
The Covid-19 vaccine is very different than other vaccines as it is the first mRNA vaccine and first coronavirus vaccine where all other coronavirus vaccines have failed in the past. Yet somehow in less than a year, without long term testing trials and skipped animal testing, this one is our supposed redemption. I’ve done all the research for you with as many credible sources that I can find. No “conspiracy theory” blogs or articles. I have tried to keep news links to a minimum here for sources as they often are unreliable. This is the real deal and the facts for those who want it straight from the source.
You can find all sources referenced cited in each section..Special thanks to fellow freedom fighters for helping me compile these great sources. All we want to do is help people and get this information out there.
Covid-19 Vaccine Ingredients List
- RNA ingredient BNT-162B2 (UNII: 5085ZFP6S) (RNA ingredient BNT-162B2 – UNII:5085ZFP6S)
Basis of Strength: RNA ingredient BNT-162B2
Strength: 0.23 mg in 1.8 mL
- lipid ALC-0159 (UNII: PJH39UMU6H) and lipid ALC-0315 (UNII: AVX8DX713V)
- POTASSIUM CHLORIDE (UNII: 660YQ98I10)
- MONOBASIC POTASSIUM PHOSPHATE (UNII: 4J9FJ0HL51)
- SODIUM CHLORIDE (UNII: 451W47IQ8X)
- SODIUM PHOSPHATE, DIBASIC, UNSPECIFIED FORM (UNII: GR686LBA74)
- SUCROSE (UNII: C151H8M554)
Ingredients explained, sourced from direct communications of Pfizer and Moderna Therapeutics: https://www.technologyreview.com/…/what-are-the…/
It should also be noted in this review that lipid ALC-0315 is the primary ingredient in the formulation and it’s also a component that can cause side-effects or allergic reactions. In addition, in regard to the RNA ingredient:
“The spike gene sequence can be tweaked in small ways for better performance, by means that include swapping letters. We don’t think Pfizer has said exactly what sequence it is using, or what modified nucleosides. That means the content of the shot may not be 100% public.”technologyreview.com
Why is the content of the shot not 100% public? Shouldn’t we have the right to know everything that is in the vaccine? This is vital in order to properly give informed consent to taking it.
Ingredients Source: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm…
The Vaccine Doesn’t Even Contain The Virus
“To build an mRNA vaccine, scientists only need access to the genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2, and not the actual virus. Our scientists have focused on the genetic sequence for the virus’s “spike” protein, which can then be used to synthesize an mRNA sequence, instructions that the cell can use to make the “spike” protein. The Synthetic mRNA is then packaged in a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) that serves as a “delivery vehicle” shuttling the instructions to our cells. Once inside the cells, the cellular machinery follows the mRNA instructions to product the viral protein, which is then displayed on the surface of the cell and stimulates the immune system to mount a response.”pfizer.co.uk
POSSIBLE COVID-19 VACCINE SIDE EFFECTS
Possible Mild Side Effects List:
- Muscle pain
- Joint pain
Possible Serious Side Effects List:
- Guillain-Barré syndrome
- Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
- Transverse myelitis
- Narcolepsy and cataplexy
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Autoimmune disease
- Pregnancy and birth outcomes
- Other acute demyelinating diseases
- Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions
- Disseminated intravascular coagulation
- Venous thromboembolism
- Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain
- Kawasaki disease
- Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
- Vaccine enhanced disease
- Bell’s Palsy was also reported in 4 of the volunteers who took the covid-19 vaccine. Interestingly, the FDA denies it was caused by the vaccine.
- While unreported by the FDA or Pfizer, infertility in women was brought up in an urgent letter by Dr. med. Wolfgang Wodarg of Germany and Dr. Michael Yeadon of England to the European Medicines Agency. It is encouraged that everyone read through this entire letter as it presents some very important grave concerns and risks regarding the RNA ingredient BNT-162B2 of the Covid-19 vaccine, as well as other important information and concerns.
- It should also be noted that the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency has stated:
“Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer BioNtech vaccine.”UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency
Doctor directive responses for covid-19 vaccine questions on the CDC website:
I particularly want to call attention to the “Questions about Unknown, Serious, Long-term Side Effects” section. They do not know what long term side effects may be, except that they will be recording them as they pop up. This is not reassuring, in my opinion, but you can decide for yourself how you feel about it.
- https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download Page 17 (serious side effects)
- https://www.goodrx.com/blog/side-effects-covid-19-vaccine/ (mild side effects)
- https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/hcp/answering-questions.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fvaccines%2Fhcp%2Fcovid-conversations%2Fanswering-questions.html (CDC Directive for doctors answering covid vaccine questions).
- https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9030943/Four-volunteers-got-Pfizers-vaccine-developed-Bells-palsy.html (Bell’s Palsy report)
- https://snacksafely.com/2020/12/those-with-significant-history-of-allergic-reactions-warned-to-avoid-pfizer-covid-vaccine/ (UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency statement)
- https://web.archive.org/web/20201201152655/https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf (Urgent Letter regarding infertility side effect on page 5 & other highly important information)
Real Covid-19 Statistics & Chance Of Death in Canada
According to the Canada website’s own statistics, if you refer to figure 5 and click on deceased from the drop down (as of today’s date 12/10/2020), there have been a total of only 439 covid-related deaths in people under the age of 60 in all of Canada, 932 deaths for those under the age of 70, 2365 under the age of 80, and 9085 for ages 80+. Canada’s population as of this writing is 37,891,680. To put into perspective, the deaths of those under the age of 60 make up 0.001% of the population. Deaths of those under the age of 70 make up 0.002% of the population. The deaths of those under the age of 80 make up 0.006% of the population. The deaths of those 80+ make up 0.02% of the population.
Total covid deaths only make up 0.029% of Canada’s population. The likeliness of dying from covid is extremely, extremely low. This virus has been blown way out of proportion by our governments and the media. This is not a public health emergency like they are trying to convince you that it is.
To put into further perspective, if you catch Covid-19 and are under the age of 20, your chance of death is 0.004%. For ages 20-29, your chance of death is 0.02%. For ages 30-39, your chance of death is 0.04%. If you catch covid and are 40-49, you chance of death is 0.1%. For ages 50-59, your chance of death is 0.5%. For ages 60-69, your chance of death is 2.7%. If you catch covid and are 70-79, your chance of death is 11.1%. For ages 80+, your chance of death is 25.8%. Chance of death calculations are based on the percentage of current cases and current deaths as shown in figure 3 and figure 5.
Please keep in mind, statistics are lumped with those who die WITH covid and those who die OF covid, which can be two very different things. That is how they are recorded. This means if someone died of a clear, alternate cause, but still tested positive for covid-19, they are included in the covid-19 death toll. This should be very encouraging, because although the numbers are undetermined, this means the number of those who died directly due to covid-19 are likely far lower than what has been recorded. Thus, would make the actual percentages for chance of death much lower than what is shown through Canada’s Covid-19 statistics.
This doesn’t mean that covid-19 doesn’t exist, nor does it mean you can’t or won’t experience very bad symptoms. But the chance of death is extremely low for the general population and early treatments can help ensure the virus does not become a serious illness. (continue reading to learn about proven effective covid-19 treatments)
This information is given to help you make an informed decision weighing if the vaccine is worth the risk of the very serious side effects it may have on your body, or if catching covid-19 itself is more or less of a risk you’d rather take. There are alternative treatment options available.
- https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html and https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/canada-population/
Other Proven Covid-19 Treatments
Should you ever catch Covid-19, speak with your doctor about the treatments mentioned below – especially Ivermectin as it has been found to be extremely effective against Covid-19. There are plenty of medical studies for each of the treatments mentioned. A good place to research through real medical studies about these treatments is https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
- Pierre Kory, M.D., Associate Professor of Medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center speaks out there there are other proven treatments such as Ivermectin available that have miraculous effectiveness against Covid-19 that could save the lives of patients, but governments are ignoring this treatment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tq8SXOBy-4w
- Ivermectin is extremely effective for COVID-19 treatment. Here is a meta analysis of 23 studies: https://ivmmeta.com/
- COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment with Vitamin C from the California Institute for Human Science: https://www.cihs.edu/single-post/2020/03/20/COVID-19-Prevention-and-Treatment-Vitamin-C
- Despite the negative press this year, Hydroxychloroquine has in fact been proven to be effective against Covid-19. Studies show it is quite safe with the appropriate dosage. Hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19 medical journal by Dr Neeraj Sinha from the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine: https://pmj.bmj.com/content/96/1139/550
- Melatonin is significantly associated with survival of intubated COVID-19 patients. – https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.15.20213546v1
If other treatments are available to fight this virus, especially ones such as Ivermectic that have had such high success rates against covid-19, why is this not being publicized or prescribed by our doctors? Why is our government acting as though the vaccine is the only solution to return life back to a semi-state of normality when there are clearly other proven effective alternatives? There’s no reason life can not return back to normal when such treatments exist. Why aren’t our governments and the media promoting these things? Why aren’t our doctors prescribing them if they are proven they can help us?
Upcoming Vaccine Mandates & Other Important Information
In Ontario Canada, Ontario’s Chief medical officer of health Dr. David Williams addresses if the Covid-19 vaccine will be made mandatory. Fortunately, he states it will not, however, those who do not get it will be required to wear personal protective equipment in order to go to certain places or do certain things. Those who do get it will require proof of immunization in order to bypass current protective restrictions. https://youtu.be/08QT6pC5H9E?t=1549
According to the Canadian National Report on Immunization of 1996, immunization can NOT be made mandatory in Canada.
“immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution. Only three provinces have legislation or regulations under their health-protection acts to require proof of immunization for school entrance. Ontario and New Brunswick require proof for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella immunization. In Manitoba, only measles vaccination is covered. It must be emphasized that, in these three provinces, exceptions are permitted for medical or religious grounds and reasons of conscience; legislation and regulations must not be interpreted to imply compulsory immunization.”phac-aspc.gc.ca
Can you give COVID-19 to anyone, after having the vaccine?
“The vaccine cannot give you COVID-19 infection, and 2 doses will reduce your chance of becoming seriously ill. We do not yet know whether it will stop you from catching and passing on the virus. So, it is important to follow the guidance in your local area to protect those around you.”UK Government
It should be noted here that it is clear, receiving the vaccine will not return us back to the old normal, and they don’t even know if it will prevent you from catching or spreading the virus.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler warns about the politicizing of the pandemic, but also, discusses the science how all past coronavirus vaccines have failed, discusses how the current covid-19 vaccine has skipped animal testing safety trials, how this vaccine has been rushed, how Maderna reported 21% of people are having serious adverse effects from the vaccine trial, how ventillators are known to kill people, and other important informative data.
The Nuremburg Code & Voluntary Consent
“What Is the Nuremberg Code?imarcresearch.com
When World War II ended in 1945, the victorious Allied powers enacted the International Military Tribunal on November 19th, 1945. As part of the Tribunal, a series of trials were held against major war criminals and Nazi sympathizers holding leadership positions in political, military, and economic areas. The first trial conducted under the Nuremberg Military Tribunals in 1947 became known as The Doctors’ Trial, in which 23 physicians from the German Nazi Party were tried for crimes against humanity for the atrocious experiments they carried out on unwilling prisoners of war. Many of the grotesque medical experiments took place at the Auschwitz concentration camp, where Jewish prisoners were tattooed with dehumanizing numbers onto their arms; numbers that would later be used to identify their bodies after death.
The Doctors’ Trial is officially titled “The United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al.,” and it was conducted at the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany. The trial was conducted here because this was one of the few largely undamaged buildings that remained intact from extensive Allied bombing during the war. It is also said to have been symbolically chosen because it was the ceremonial birthplace of the Nazi Party. Of the 23 defendants, 16 were found guilty, of which seven received death sentences and nine received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment. The other 7 defendants were acquitted.
The verdict also resulted in the creation of the Nuremberg Code, a set of ten ethical principles for human experimentation.
What Are The Nuremberg Code’s Ethical Guidelines For Research?
The Nuremberg Code aimed to protect human subjects from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured at concentration camps.”
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill, and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.nejm.org
I hope this information is helpful in making a well informed decision. This year is a year of a lot of misinformation and censorship, so I really just wanted to create a post I believe to only contain reliably sourced information that people can feel confident in sharing and reading no matter what you believe to be true about the covid-19 virus. You are also encouraged to do your own independent research and dig into this further. It is everyone’s own responsibility to do this to make an informed decision, though, I hope this helps everyone get started and grasp an general understanding of the vaccine, the risks, real alternative and effective treatments, and understanding the importance of your informed consent.
If anyone has anything additional they would like to add that they feel would be beneficial for others to know regarding this vaccine, feel free to post it in the comments. I may edit this post in the future with additional credibly sourced information as I find it, so if you find this post valuable, be sure to bookmark it or save it.
Please share this post and get this information out there. If you’d like to see me cover another topic, please comment your suggestions.